My dad once said to me, "You give a lot of books three stars." I do.
Harriet the Spy is a book I always knew about and never read. For no reason in particular that I can remember (other than perhaps no one recommended it or gave it to me). This make me sad now because I missed out on many years of enjoying Harriet and her story. It definitely holds up to the test of time. Great coming-of-age book.
My coworker (again, the one with the best taste) recommended this book to me.
Let me take this moment to say that I didn't really enjoy a Series of Unfortunate Events by Lemony Snicket. He was always going on about how their lives were so terrible, but I just thought they're not dead, they're still together, much worse things could be happening to them... It just never felt like he really delivered on the promise that the Baudelaires' lives were so horrible.
I had no such problems with A Tale Dark and Grimm. It does exactly what it says on the tin. One of the best fractured fairy tales I've read.
My coworker (who has the best taste) recommended this book to me telling me it would make me cry (I appreciated the warning so I didn't end up reading it on desk). It absolutely made me cry. It also gave me that feeling that the best children's books do, that twelve-year-old feeling that's both joyful and painful. After reading it I immediately wanted to reread all of Sharon Creech's best stuff (but didn't have time because of school and stuff).
I don't remember much about this book other than liking the illustrations and wishing (just the tiniest bit) that I still lived somewhere where it snows in the winter. My first introduction to hygge (other than an episode of QI possibly?), and I don't think it was a bad one.
I went through a girl detective phase this spring which included revisiting Nancy Drew. I read a bunch of these as a kid but got tired because it never seemed possible to solve the mystery yourself (I moved on to Encyclopedia Brown). I was planning on reading The Hidden Staircase as well but didn't get around to it. I don't feel any burning desire to read more, but it was fun to revisit Nancy Drew for one book.
After our disastrous book discussion on Lincoln Jones, we got to discuss When You Reach Me. Book discussion only went slightly better. There were about seven people, half of whom hadn't finished reading the book or were very confused about the plot.
In preparation I reread the book three times (once per month leading up to the meeting). Normally I don't reread books I love that quickly because I'm afraid they'll lose their magic. It was great every time though. Rereading really let me see all the ways the story is working and pick up on all the clues.
One of our children's librarians loves this series. She read all of them. Having read the first, I can see why. They're a good starter chapter book series with more substance than most. The 11-year-old liked these when she was younger.
We read this for book club back in March and the author came to our book discussion. About half the attendees were white. Lincoln Jones' race came up and Van Draanen said she purposely kept everything (location, everyone's race, etc) vague so the book could be read as people want. It's like she wanted brownie points for writing a black kid without the potential of backlash for doing it poorly.
Of course, all the white people went on and on about how great that was and how they KNEW Lincoln was black (I didn't know until an old white character mistakes him for boys she met while a missionary in Africa... I can't remember if a specific country was named) and they also knew the character who work with Lincoln's mom (retirement home/care facility) were also not white because of course people who would have these jobs aren't white, but everyone who lives in the facility is white (basically it was a lot of racist nonsense about how non-white people should be servants to white people OBVIOUSLY).
And then Van Draanen also talked about how she uses sensitivity readers and she works so hard to be authentic (also BS). She wrote a book with Native American characters (Paiute) with storytelling as a major element. A sensitivity reader told her Paiute don't tell stories at the time of year the book is set in. Instead of rewriting/reworking the story, Van Draanen ignored the sensitivity reader and published the book anyway.
The entire discussion left a really sour taste in my mouth. So many super ignorant and racist remarks from these annoying white people (Oh, we don't see color, but we also know that every poor character in this book isn't white because authenticity, we're so progressive!!!).
I enjoy Van Draanen's Sammy Keyes series, but have been very cautious with my reading and recommending of her books since March.
I had just Googled when Brian Selznick's next book was coming out when Baby Monkey, Private Eye came in our shipment at work. The title hadn't shown up in my Google search (possibly because the author is credited as David Serlin, Selznick's husband?).
I checked it out immediately and was not disappointed. The story is very cute and the illustrations are full of visual allusions (which are explained at the back of the book). I don't know if there are plans for more Baby Monkey books, but if there are I'll definitely be checking those out too.
I don't really remember reading this. It might have been because I was feeling really dissatisfied with Poe's character after TLJ, and I thought this might make me feel better? It clearly wasn't enough to interest me in the series though. I think Rey and Finn show up in some later issues. Maybe I'll just try and track those down (but probably not...).
When I'm not reading HDM, sometimes I'll wonder if these little companion books are necessary. And then I reread HDM, find myself desperate for more of Lyra and her world and decide, yes, they absolutely are. Now give us the green book already, Philip Pullman.
Wow wow wow this is not what I'm here for.
"Another [danger] is that an actual government--like the secretive rulers of North Korea--might just be crazy enough to lash out with atomic bombs." ... you mean like the US did at the end of WWII because Japan wouldn't surrender?
The book wants to be a spy thriller but misses largely on the thriller aspect. I know the scientists succeed, and I have no attachment to any of the players in the story so the stakes are very low while reading. It's also difficult to get caught up in espionage antics when you know the end result is two atomic bombs dropped on civilians.
It's not worth the time. I skimmed most of the end and a lot of the middle. Wouldn't have kept reading if it weren't on NPR's Ultimate Backseat Bookshelf list.
I'm super behind on my book reviews. I'm going to try and catch up soon. In the meantime I'm adding dates for the books I've read that don't need reviews. Sorry if this floods your timeline. I've been using this site for four(?) years, and I still don't understand it.
Wow wow wow!
This is what I'm here for. The first book from NPR's Ultimate Backseat Bookshelf that I enjoyed. When I started I worried it was going to be too much. But then I got into the characters and the story and it's one of those books you can't stop reading (which leads to you almost crying on desk at work).
It's reminiscent of EL Konigsburg's Silent to the Bone. The book would lull me into thinking I knew where it was going yet still managed to surprise me several times. If I have time, I might have to check out The Wednesday Wars to see if it's as good.
I wish I could find a list of all the books referenced (usually obliquely) in the book. I think I guessed most of them, but it would be nice to have confirmation.
Another from NPR's Ultimate Backseat Bookshelf.
This definitely felt like a message book. The author wanted to make the point that bullying is bad so she wrote this book with the point that bullying is bad.
I don't think it was as terrible as some other reviewers (e.g. the fact that Auggie wins an award for being born the way he is is lampshaded in the book which makes the scene slightly more palatable than if it hadn't been). But it's not great.
I thought the writing was inconsistent. Or maybe it was too consistent? Every character sounds the same, and every character sounds older than they're supposed to be. If Auggie and Via had been aged up, their voices would have made more sense (with the exception of all the use of Mommy/Daddy... what was up with that?).
I'm not mad I read it, but if I weren't aiming to check it off my list I wouldn't have finished it.
Another one from NPR's Ultimate Backseat Bookshelf.
I've owned this book forever. My grandma gave it to me, and I just never got around to reading it. It would not have appealed to me as a kid, and I had to resort to skimming several times because the story was too graphic.
The writing felt inconsistent. Sometimes it was great and I was really immersed in the story. Other times it was so boring it felt like a slog to finish. The pacing was equally inconsistent. There are so many interesting ideas in the book that went nowhere.
If I hadn't challenged myself to complete it, I would have quit reading about 100 pages in. I'm not mad that I've read it. I guess I'm just confused why it keeps ending up on best of lists. Has no one written a better kids cloning book since 2002? Maybe it's because I'm not a fan of sci-fi. Maybe I'm just not getting it.